<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vaccine Myths Round Four</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2010/02/28/vaccine-myths-round-four/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2010/02/28/vaccine-myths-round-four/</link>
	<description>A Forum for Parents from Parents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EliminateVariables</title>
		<link>http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2010/02/28/vaccine-myths-round-four/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>EliminateVariables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/?p=701#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>I have gone through all the vital stats from CDC and have come to the same conclusion as the revealed graphs above. Notice most stats showing vaccines were responsible start at 1950 to present and fail to show previous drops recorded from as far as 1890.
Also many of their graphs do not show references or citations and simply want the viewer to trust the statement simply because the author&#039;s name is followed by a Phd or MD.

Question the science, read boths sides and make your own conclusion. It wins everytime!

Great job IV...love the site too!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have gone through all the vital stats from CDC and have come to the same conclusion as the revealed graphs above. Notice most stats showing vaccines were responsible start at 1950 to present and fail to show previous drops recorded from as far as 1890.<br />
Also many of their graphs do not show references or citations and simply want the viewer to trust the statement simply because the author&#8217;s name is followed by a Phd or MD.</p>
<p>Question the science, read boths sides and make your own conclusion. It wins everytime!</p>
<p>Great job IV&#8230;love the site too!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2010/02/28/vaccine-myths-round-four/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/?p=701#comment-974</guid>
		<description>Hi David,
Sorry, we have our hands full writing our own articles. Taking on Wikipedia is beyond our time and energy range. Feel free to draw on our sources if you want to, however. We do provide citations or links to all of our data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,<br />
Sorry, we have our hands full writing our own articles. Taking on Wikipedia is beyond our time and energy range. Feel free to draw on our sources if you want to, however. We do provide citations or links to all of our data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide Chiavegatti</title>
		<link>http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2010/02/28/vaccine-myths-round-four/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide Chiavegatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/?p=701#comment-966</guid>
		<description>Hello! 
Great job, I must say.
Please take a look on Wikipedia, where other stats are reported. The pages on Wiki related to vaccines look a bit biased. Some example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPT_vaccine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal_controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy
Maybe you have a say on that.
My warmest regards.
DC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
Great job, I must say.<br />
Please take a look on Wikipedia, where other stats are reported. The pages on Wiki related to vaccines look a bit biased. Some example:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_controversy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_controversy</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPT_vaccine" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPT_vaccine</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal_controversy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal_controversy</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy</a><br />
Maybe you have a say on that.<br />
My warmest regards.<br />
DC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
